stackrpms - Rpm and dpkg build recipes for my custom packages

	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Age
*	ffs rpm rc1 for 10.24	B Stack	2020-05-18
\|
*	10.22 rpm rc1	B Stack	2020-03-18
\|
*	fix ffs_el.patch serialize.h	B Stack	2019-12-27
\|
*	ffs 10.19 rpm rc1	B Stack	2019-12-27
\|
*	ffs_el7: -std=c++17	B Stack	2019-11-22
\|
*	freefilesync on el7 compiles now	B Stack	2019-11-21
\|
*	WIP: ffs 10.18 rpm	B Stack	2019-11-20
\|
*	freefilesync: el7 use c++2a now	B Stack	2019-10-23
\| \| \| \|	Thanks to devtoolset-8, el7 can now compile against -std=c++2a
*	WIP: test a separate patch for the include <bit>	B Stack	2019-10-22
\|
*	WIP: fix el patch	B Stack	2019-10-22
\|
*	WIP: ffs el patch	B Stack	2019-10-22
\|
*	WIP: freefilesync 10.17 rpm rc1	B Stack	2019-10-22
\| \| \| \| \|	Attempt at updating the patches for 10.17. Need to try with libcurl 7.66.0 which my local install does not have.
*	freefilesync 10.15 rpm rc1	B Stack	2019-08-16
\|
*	freefilesync 10.13 rpm rc1	B Stack	2019-06-15
\| \| \| \| \| \|	Fixes #8 .desktop file is missing mimetypes: Added the hooks for dealing with mimetypes, and the icons, and the desktop file mimetype info
*	freefilesync build 10.11 rpm on el7	B Stack	2019-04-12
\|
*	freefilesync build 10.11 rpm on fedora	B Stack	2019-04-12
\|
*	WIP: remove the use of %dist to include patches	B Stack	2019-02-19
	I finally realized that copr builds the srpm in a fedora environment and then uses that srpm everywhere, including the epel-6 and epel-7 chroots, where the el7.patch file was now absent. So now the spec depends on both ffs_fedora.patch and ffs_el.patch