diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | README.md | 38 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 33 deletions
@@ -78,38 +78,10 @@ rm /tmp/$$.icon This is my first time using the GTK+ C library, and I've got to say it is less than pleasant to work with. My biggest issue has been trying to do blocking IO -without blocking the GUI thread, as GTK seems to not like that. They've -deprecated most of the threading stuff, and only left this -`g_main_context_invoke` mess, which doesn't even seem to work all of the time. +without blocking the GUI thread, as GTK seems to not like that. -So, every now and again, the program will just die completely with one of the -following messages: +There are bound to be bugs, but the most important ones for now are +[#1](https://github.com/Jonhoo/mktrayicon/issues/1) and +[#2](https://github.com/Jonhoo/mktrayicon/issues/2). -``` -Xlib: sequence lost (0x100c1 > 0xc3) in reply type 0x1c! -[xcb] Unknown request in queue while dequeuing -[xcb] Most likely this is a multi-threaded client and XInitThreads has not been called -[xcb] Aborting, sorry about that. - -[xcb] Unknown sequence number while processing queue -[xcb] Most likely this is a multi-threaded client and XInitThreads has not been called -[xcb] Aborting, sorry about that. -mktrayicon: xcb_io.c:274: poll_for_event: Assertion `!xcb_xlib_threads_sequence_lost' failed. - -Xlib: sequence lost (0x100c1 > 0xc3) in reply type 0x1c! -[xcb] Unknown request in queue while dequeuing -[xcb] Most likely this is a multi-threaded client and XInitThreads has not been called -[xcb] Aborting, sorry about that. -mktrayicon: xcb_io.c:179: dequeue_pending_request: Assertion `!xcb_xlib_unknown_req_in_deq' failed. -``` - -If someone has a genious way to fix this, patches are welcome. If you have a -solution, you can get some Stackoverflow reputation over at [this -question](http://stackoverflow.com/questions/18647475/threading-problems-with-gtk/18651036) -as well. - -Also, it would be nice if removing the FIFO file would cause `mktrayicon` to -exit automatically as if "q" was sent. Unfortunately, this is not entirely -trivial to implement. Have a look -[here](http://stackoverflow.com/questions/18643486/detect-deletion-of-fifo-file-with-blocking-open) -and send a patch my way if you know how to do it. +**Patches are very welcome!** |